B BROCENT

The Real Cost and Legal Risk of IT Staffing in Vietnam: Termination, Severance, and the Licensed Labor-Lease Trap

An industry research analysis for procurement, legal, and finance leaders at international buyers sourcing IT talent in Vietnam: the statutory cost stack, the licensed labor-lease regime and its 20-occupation limit, and the termination mechanics that determine what an exit actually costs.

Software engineers working together in a modern technology office in Ho Chi Minh City, representing Vietnam's IT staffing and outsourcing market

Executive Summary

This report is for procurement, legal, finance, and executive audiences at international companies sourcing IT engineering talent in Vietnam. It answers two questions Vietnam engagements consistently get wrong: what an engineer costs fully loaded, and what it costs to end the engagement. Assumptions imported from mainland China transfer poorly — Vietnam's Labor Code 2019 is an enumerated-grounds statute, so an employer cannot terminate for a reason that is commercially sensible but not on the list, yet employer-paid severance is genuinely low because a government-administered unemployment insurance scheme has absorbed most of the obligation.

  • Employer contributions total a headline 21.5%, but with social and health insurance capped at 20 times the government reference level, the effective rate for a mid-level engineer is nearer 20% of gross, falling to 8–12% at architect level.
  • Fully loaded cost — contributions plus the market-standard 13th-month payment — runs roughly 28% above gross, before vendor margin and VAT.
  • Severance allowance is usually small or zero, because the qualifying period is total service minus every month covered by unemployment insurance.
  • Job-loss allowance is the expensive one: one month's wage per qualifying year subject to a floor of two months' wages, plus a labor utilization plan, consultation, and 30 days' notice to the provincial People's Committee.
  • Unlawful termination is the dominant risk: reinstatement, full back pay, insurance premiums for the whole period out of work, and at least two months' wages. A year-long dispute can cost about 20 months' salary.
  • The licensed labor-lease regime is capped at 12 months and confined to 20 permitted occupations, none of which is core software engineering.

1. The Employment Relationship and Vietnam's Licensed Labor-Lease Regime

1.1 Three Arrangements That Look Alike and Are Not

Direct employment. The buyer's Vietnamese entity signs the contract and carries the cost stack in Section 2 and the termination exposure in Section 3.

Labor lease (cho thuê lại lao động). A licensed Vietnamese enterprise employs the engineer and leases them to a client enterprise, which directs daily work. The Labor Code declares this a conditional business requiring a licence and applicable only to certain types of work.

Service outsourcing. A vendor delivers a defined scope using its own supervised employees, invoicing against deliverables rather than headcount, under general contract law.

The common failure is a vendor marketing the second as the third, or a buyer contracting for the third and operating the second — and translation compounds it, since the Vietnamese term for labor lease appears in English as "labor outsourcing," "labor sublease," "labor dispatch," and "employee subleasing" interchangeably. Establish which regime applies from the Vietnamese instrument and licence status, not the English label.

1.2 What the Labor-Lease Licence Restricts

Four constraints apply at once, and each can invalidate an arrangement on its own. Licence and deposit: only a licensed enterprise may act as lessor, backed by a VND 2 billion deposit — and critically, a client enterprise must not employ an employee leased by an unlicensed enterprise, so the prohibition attaches to the buyer too. A twelve-month ceiling: the maximum lease duration is 12 months, an outer boundary rather than a renewable convenience — an engineer embedded on labor-lease paperwork for two or three years is, on the statute's face, outside the regime it claims to operate under. Three permitted use cases: a sharp time-limited demand increase, covering an employee on leave, or work requiring highly skilled workers — it may not replace strikers or an employee made redundant for structural/economic reasons, so a buyer that makes engineers redundant and backfills with leased labor walks into an express prohibition. A closed list of 20 occupations under Decree 145/2020/ND-CP, clustered around interpreting, clerical, sales-support, and specialised transport/aviation roles — there is no general category for application development, platform engineering, or software architecture, so a core engineering role sits outside the list entirely.

1.3 How This Compares with China's Dispatch Framework

China constrains dispatch through a 10% headcount cap plus a role test, with joint and several liability attaching to the user unit. Vietnam has no percentage cap — the constraint is a hard 12-month ceiling plus a closed occupational list, so arithmetic is irrelevant and the role is either on the list or it is not, a harder test to argue around in which duration alone can defeat an otherwise reasonable arrangement.

2. The Statutory Cost Stack

2.1 Contributions and Their Ceilings

Whichever party is the legal employer, the same contributions apply — which is why a compliant vendor's underlying cost converges regardless of commercial label.

  • Retirement and survivorship. Employer: 14%  Employee: 8%  Base ceiling: 20× reference level
  • Sickness and maternity. Employer: 3%  Employee: —  Base ceiling: 20× reference level
  • Occupational accident and disease. Employer: 0.5%  Employee: —  Base ceiling: 20× reference level
  • Health insurance. Employer: 3%  Employee: 1.5%  Base ceiling: 20× reference level
  • Unemployment insurance. Employer: 1%  Employee: 1%  Base ceiling: 20× regional minimum wage
  • Total. Employer: 21.5%  Employee: 10.5%

Two ceilings do the analytical work, on different bases. Decree No. 161/2026/ND-CP raised the reference level to VND 2,530,000/month from 1 July 2026, capping the social/health insurance base at VND 50,600,000; the unemployment insurance ceiling is instead 20× the regional minimum wage, set for Region I (Ho Chi Minh City, Hanoi) at VND 5,310,000 from 1 January 2026, giving VND 106,200,000.

Foreign employees pay social and health insurance but not unemployment insurance, so their employer rate is 20.5% and, per Section 3.3, none of their service is netted out of severance. The 13th-month payment (Tet bonus) is not statutory but near-universal practice, enforceable once written into a contract. Annual leave is a minimum of 12 working days plus 11 paid public holidays, and overtime is capped at 40 hours monthly and 200 annually.

2.2 Worked Monthly Cost Example

Assume a mid-level backend engineer in Ho Chi Minh City on gross salary of VND 55,000,000 per month, roughly USD 2,100 — representative for four to six years of experience at an international-facing employer.

  • Gross contractual salary. Rate and base: —  Monthly (VND): 55,000,000
  • Retirement and survivorship. Rate and base: 14% of capped base 50,600,000  Monthly (VND): 7,084,000
  • Sickness and maternity. Rate and base: 3% of capped base  Monthly (VND): 1,518,000
  • Occupational accident and disease. Rate and base: 0.5% of capped base  Monthly (VND): 253,000
  • Health insurance. Rate and base: 3% of capped base  Monthly (VND): 1,518,000
  • Unemployment insurance. Rate and base: 1% of 55,000,000  Monthly (VND): 550,000
  • Subtotal: statutory contributions. Rate and base: ~19.9% of gross  Monthly (VND): 10,923,000
  • 13th-month payment accrual. Rate and base: one-twelfth of annual gross  Monthly (VND): 4,583,333
  • Fully loaded monthly employer cost. Rate and base: ~28.2% above gross  Monthly (VND): ~70,506,000

The effective rate is 19.9%, not the headline 21.5%, because this salary already sits above the insurance ceiling. There is deliberately no severance reserve line: for a properly enrolled engineer the accruing severance obligation is close to nil, and the material exposure sits in the event-driven scenarios in Section 3. Above employer cost sit vendor margin, 20% corporate income tax, and VAT (10%, temporarily 8% for IT services through 31 December 2026).

2.3 The Ceiling Effect Across Seniority Bands

Because both contribution ceilings are absolute, not proportional, employer statutory load falls sharply with seniority: about 21.5% of gross for a junior engineer (VND 25,000,000), ~19.9% at mid-level (VND 55,000,000), ~12.5% for senior (VND 90,000,000), and ~8.2% at architect level (VND 140,000,000), where both ceilings are deeply crossed. A vendor quoting one blended loading factor across a mixed-seniority team is obscuring where its margin sits. Budget a compounding annual increase in the high single digits: the regional minimum wage rose 7.2% in January 2026 and the reference level 8.1% in July 2026.

3. Termination Mechanics

3.1 Grounds: An Enumerated List, Not a Reasonableness Standard

Article 36 sets out an exhaustive list of circumstances in which an employer may unilaterally terminate — there is no residual category for a termination that is commercially reasonable but unlisted: repeated failure to meet employer-established performance criteria; continuing inability to work after treatment (12 months for indefinite contracts, 6 for 12–36-month fixed terms); natural disaster or authority-mandated downsizing after all alternatives are exhausted; unexcused absence past a time limit; or reaching retirement age.

The performance ground carries a requirement that is fatal to skip: assessment criteria must be established by the employer, with input from the employee representative organization, before they are applied — terminating for underperformance without documented, pre-existing criteria does not satisfy the ground, however well evidenced the underperformance itself.

Redundancy is not on this list — it runs under Articles 42–43, with its own procedure and a more expensive allowance. Article 37 separately prohibits unilateral termination during medically certified treatment, permitted leave, or pregnancy, maternity leave, or while raising a child under 12 months — an absolute bar, not a factor to be weighed.

3.2 Notice Periods

  • Indefinite-term. Minimum advance notice: 45 days
  • Fixed-term of 12 to 36 months. Minimum advance notice: 30 days
  • Fixed-term under 12 months, and prolonged-incapacity grounds. Minimum advance notice: 3 working days
  • Specified occupations under Decree 145/2020, indefinite-term or 12 months and above. Minimum advance notice: at least 120 days
  • Specified occupations under Decree 145/2020, contract under 12 months. Minimum advance notice: at least one quarter of the term

The 120-day category matters beyond its aviation and maritime associations, because it also covers enterprise managers as defined by the Law on Enterprises — an expatriate country manager can carry a four-month notice obligation. Deficient notice does not itself make a termination unlawful, but triggers compensation equal to salary for the remaining notice period.

Vietnam permits only indefinite-term contracts and fixed terms of up to 36 months, renewable once; if the employee keeps working after the second expires, the third must be indefinite. Treat the second renewal as a decision point, since it removes non-renewal as an exit route.

3.3 Severance, Job-Loss Allowance, and Unemployment Insurance

Three mechanisms are routinely conflated. They have different payers, triggers, and amounts.

Severance allowance (trợ cấp thôi việc), Article 46. Payable by the employer to an employee with 12+ months' service on most ordinary terminations, at half a month's wage per qualifying year, on the average contractual wage over the last six months. The critical provision is Article 46(2): the qualifying period is total actual service minus the period covered by unemployment insurance. Because that insurance has long been compulsory, and the Law on Employment 2025 extended coverage to contracts of at least one month, an engineer at a compliant employer accrues almost no severance-allowance entitlement — what remains are fringes like probation (excluded from compulsory unemployment insurance) or periods the employer failed to enrol the employee.

Job-loss allowance (trợ cấp mất việc làm), Article 47. Payable where termination arises from Article 42/43 restructuring or economic scenarios, at one month's wage per qualifying year, with the total not smaller than two months' wage. The same netting applies, so the per-year component usually reduces to near zero — but the two-month floor is what the employer actually pays, and the prevailing reading is that it applies to any qualifying employee, so budget it rather than argue it away.

Unemployment insurance benefit. A state-paid benefit from the fund financed by the 1% employer/1% employee contributions — 60% of average contributed salary over the preceding six months, capped at five times the regional minimum wage, for employees who contributed 12+ months within the preceding 24. This is what makes Vietnam's low employer-paid severance coherent: the obligation has not been abolished, it has been socialised.

Modelling Vietnam severance on a China-style month-per-year basis therefore overstates ordinary termination cost, while assuming low severance means cheap exits understates the redundancy pathway and the cost of getting a termination wrong.

3.4 Worked Termination Example

Take the Section 2.2 engineer with four years of service, of which the first two months were probation not covered by unemployment insurance. The qualifying period for both allowances is two months, rounding to half a year.

  • Mutual agreement or lawful Article 36 termination. Calculation: 0.5 year × 0.5 month × 55,000,000  Employer cost (VND): 13,750,000
  • Redundancy under Article 42. Calculation: 0.5 year × 1 month = 27,500,000, raised to the two-month floor  Employer cost (VND): 110,000,000
  • Unlawful termination, resolved after 12 months. Calculation: see below  Employer cost (VND): ~1,107,000,000

The redundancy pathway costs eight times the ordinary pathway, and adds obligations that cannot be bought out: a labor utilization plan, employee-representative discussion, and 30 days' prior notice to the provincial People's Committee and employees.

  • Back pay for the period not allowed to work. Basis: 12 months × 55,000,000  Amount (VND): 660,000,000
  • Employer insurance premiums for that period. Basis: 12 months × 10,923,000  Amount (VND): 131,076,000
  • Statutory compensation. Basis: at least 2 months' salary  Amount (VND): 110,000,000
  • Compensation for un-served notice. Basis: 45 days, indefinite-term contract  Amount (VND): 82,500,000
  • Severance allowance, employee not returning. Basis: as above  Amount (VND): 13,750,000
  • Additional compensation, agreed non-reinstatement. Basis: at least 2 months' salary  Amount (VND): 110,000,000
  • Total. Amount (VND): ~1,107,326,000

That is roughly 20 months of the engineer's salary, about USD 42,000, from one engineer and one procedural failure — and it scales with the time the dispute takes, because back pay and premiums accrue throughout.

3.5 Unlawful Termination Exposure

Article 39 defines an unlawful unilateral termination simply: one that does not comply with Articles 35, 36, or 37, with no proportionality assessment or de minimis threshold. Article 41's remedy is reinstatement under the original contract, plus salary and insurance premiums for the whole period the employee was not permitted to work, plus at least two months' salary — reinstatement is the primary remedy, so an employer cannot unilaterally elect to pay its way out, and the two-month figures are statutory minimums, not caps.

4. Liability Exposure for International Buyers

4.1 Misuse of the Labor-Lease Category

The highest-consequence exposure in the market, precisely because it is invisible while the engagement runs well. A long-term core engineering role structured as leased labor fails on three independent tests — duration, occupational category, and often the permitted use case — and one failure suffices. Fines reach VND 100,000,000 for an organisation, but the significant number is what happens to the employment relationship once the arrangement falls outside the statutory regime.

4.2 Direct Claims Against the Client Enterprise

Vietnamese law does not leave the leased employee to sue only their nominal employer. Article 57 imposes obligations directly on the client enterprise — internal labor regulation guidance, non-discrimination, agreeing overtime directly — while Article 58 entitles them to salary not lower than a directly hired employee doing the same work. Article 188 then carves disputes between a leased employee and the client enterprise out of mandatory conciliation, so the law contemplates by design the leased engineer naming the buyer's Vietnamese entity as respondent with no preliminary filter. Where an arrangement labelled service outsourcing is in substance the buyer directing individual engineers, expect substance to govern.

4.3 Underfunded Unemployment Insurance Becomes Severance Liability

The corollary of Section 3.3: every month a vendor fails to enrol an engineer in unemployment insurance is a month that counts toward employer-paid severance allowance at half a month's wage per year. The Law on Employment 2025 sharpened this further, requiring an employer that fails to pay contributions in full to directly pay the employee an amount equivalent to the unemployment allowance they would have received.

4.4 Foreign Worker Permit Compliance

Decree 219/2025/ND-CP streamlined work permit processing to 10 working days and expanded exemptions to 15 categories, including finance, science, technology, and digital transformation. Two features create recurring exposure: a foreign national may work up to 90 cumulative days per calendar year without a permit, but the days aggregate across visits, so repeated short trips can cross the threshold untracked; and an expired permit is treated identically to no permit. Under Decree 12/2022/ND-CP the worker faces VND 15–25 million and deportation, the employer VND 30–75 million by headcount and doubled for organisations.

4.5 Non-Compete Enforceability

The Labor Code contains no provision authorising post-termination non-competes; Article 21 permits only confidentiality terms for business secrets or technological know-how. A non-compete must therefore be a separate civil agreement, and outcomes split: courts have frequently declined to enforce broad restraints, reasoning the right to work cannot be contracted away, while arbitral tribunals applying freedom of contract have been more receptive. Precedent No. 69/2023/AL confirmed such an agreement can be arbitrable as an independent instrument, making forum selection the most commercially significant term — provide explicit compensation for the restricted period, keep scope narrow, and treat confidentiality as the primary protection.

4.6 Where Termination Claims Actually Go

Individual labor disputes ordinarily go to a labor mediator before reaching the Labor Arbitration Council or the People's Court. But Article 188 exempts several categories from mandatory mediation — disciplinary dismissal, unilateral termination, termination damages/allowances, insurance disputes, and disputes between a leased employee and the client enterprise — which reads almost as an index of this report's subject matter. Every significant exposure above can go straight to court, and all payments must be settled within 14 working days of termination.

5. Vendor Risk Indicators

These practices recur among underpriced Vietnamese IT staffing and outsourcing quotes. None reduces real cost; each defers it and reallocates who bears it.

  • Under-declared contribution base, which converts directly into severance and benefit-equivalent liability (Section 4.3).
  • Non-enrolment in unemployment insurance, or delayed enrolment.
  • Labor lease presented as outsourcing, or the reverse, with documents that do not identify the applicable regime, or no licence at all in an arrangement that is in substance a lease.
  • Long-term embedded engineers on labor-lease paperwork, exceeding the 12-month ceiling or outside the permitted occupation list.
  • No documented performance evaluation criteria, leaving the Article 36 performance ground unavailable.
  • Expatriate staff without a current permit or documented exemption, or past the 90-day annual threshold.

A quote materially below the Section 2.2 baseline is an indicator that one or more of these is present, not evidence of a more efficient delivery model.

6. Three Engagement Structures

Licensed Vietnamese labor-lease vendor. Suited to a defined, time-bounded surge or specialised skills not economically maintained in-house — but only where the engagement is genuinely under 12 months, the role sits within the permitted occupation list, and the use case is one of the three permitted grounds. Almost every long-term core engineering engagement fails at least one test, so size duration and role classification against the statute before pricing, and verify the licence and deposit rather than accept an assurance.

The buyer's own Vietnam entity. Suited to durable engineering capability, with no labor-lease category question and no client-enterprise liability theory to defend. The trade-off is carrying the Section 2 cost stack directly and maintaining compliance infrastructure — internal labor regulations, documented evaluation criteria, permit administration. Below a headcount in the low hundreds, a licensed payroll provider is usually more capital-efficient than in-house capability.

Vietnamese outsourcing vendor delivering a defined scope. Suited to a defined product or service level, and outside the labor-lease regime entirely — which is why the boundary must be maintained operationally, not merely contractually. Where the buyer's project managers assign daily work to named individuals and run them through the buyer's performance cycle, the arrangement invites re-characterisation and the direct-claim route in Section 4.2 becomes live.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why is severance pay in Vietnam so much lower than in China?

Because Vietnam socialised most of the obligation. Severance allowance is half a month's wage per year of service, but the qualifying period excludes every month the employee participated in unemployment insurance — compulsory for many years and extended from 1 January 2026 to contracts of at least one month. For a properly enrolled engineer only fringe periods such as probation remain; the protection is delivered instead as a government benefit of 60% of average contribution salary (Section 3.3).

What is the difference between severance allowance and job-loss allowance, and which will we actually pay?

Severance allowance applies to ordinary terminations at half a month's wage per qualifying year. Job-loss allowance applies to restructuring, technological change, economic reasons, or corporate reorganisation, at one month's wage per qualifying year with a floor of two months' wages. Both net out unemployment-insurance-covered service, which usually reduces the per-year component to near zero — so the two-month floor is what a redundancy costs, eight times the ordinary figure in the Section 3.4 example.

Can we structure a long-term software engineering team as leased or outsourced labor in Vietnam?

Not under the labor-lease regime. It is capped at 12 months, confined to three permitted use cases, and restricted to 20 occupations under Decree 145/2020/ND-CP that exclude general software development, platform engineering, cloud infrastructure, and data engineering — so a long-term core engineering role fails on duration and occupational category independently. Genuine service outsourcing sits outside the lease regime, but only holds if the vendor actually directs the work.

What does an unlawful termination actually cost in Vietnam?

Reinstatement under the original contract, plus salary and employer insurance premiums for the entire period the employee was not permitted to work, plus at least two months' salary. Deficient notice adds the un-served period; an employee who does not return adds severance allowance; agreed non-reinstatement adds a further two months at minimum. For a mid-level engineer on VND 55,000,000 with a dispute resolved after twelve months, the illustrative total is roughly VND 1.1 billion — about 20 months' salary (Sections 3.4 and 3.5).

7. Strategic Recommendations

  1. Classify the engagement structure before negotiating price, from the Vietnamese instrument and the vendor's licence status rather than the English label.
  2. Test every leased role against duration, occupation list, and use case. All three must hold; for core, long-term engineering, treat the route as unavailable.
  3. Model cost on the effective, not headline, contribution rate, applying the ceilings by seniority band rather than a flat 21.5% loading.
  4. Reserve for termination by event, not by monthly accrual — the two-month job-loss floor and the unlawful-termination multiple.
  5. Put documented performance evaluation criteria in place before they are needed, with consideration of the employee representative organization's views.
  6. Verify unemployment insurance enrolment on the actual contribution base, since under-enrolment converts a 1% contribution into severance liability.

8. Conclusion

Vietnam is a genuinely attractive IT sourcing market: an effective employer contribution load near 20% of gross for a mid-level engineer, falling further with seniority, and an ordinary severance obligation close to nil because the state has assumed it. The risk sits elsewhere, in two places — structural (a licensed labor-lease regime with a hard 12-month ceiling and a closed occupation list that excludes core software engineering, plus a carve-out letting a leased engineer sue the client enterprise directly) and procedural (an enumerated-grounds statute in which a commercially sensible dismissal without pre-existing documentation is simply unlawful, with reinstatement as the primary remedy). The correct question is not whether Vietnam is cheaper, but whether the engagement sits in a category the law recognises, and whether the buyer has built, in advance, the documentation that makes a lawful exit possible.

This analysis is provided for general informational purposes and reflects a general understanding of Vietnamese labor law and market practice as of July 2026. Contribution rates, the government reference level, regional minimum wages, and tax rates are revised periodically and vary by region. International buyers should confirm current figures and obtain Vietnamese legal and tax advice before finalising any Vietnam IT staffing or outsourcing arrangement.

Sources and Regulatory References

  1. Labor Code of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam, Code No. 45/2019/QH14, National Assembly, effective 1 January 2021 — contract types (Articles 20, 25–27), termination (Articles 34, 36, 37, 39, 41), restructuring (42–44), severance allowance (46), job-loss allowance (47), labor lease (52–58), overtime/leave (107, 113–114), and dispute conciliation (187–190). Sections 1, 2.1, 3, 4.2, 4.5, 4.6.
  2. Decree No. 145/2020/ND-CP, effective 1 February 2021 — the 120-day notice period, qualifying-period calculation, labor lease licensing/deposit, and the 20 permitted occupations. Sections 1.2, 3.2, 3.3, 5.
  3. Law on Employment, No. 74/2025/QH15, effective 1 January 2026, with Decree No. 374/2025/ND-CP — expanded unemployment insurance coverage, contribution rates, benefit formula, and employer liability for unpaid contributions. Sections 2.1, 3.3, 4.3.
  4. Law on Social Insurance, No. 41/2024/QH15, effective 1 July 2025 — compulsory social/health insurance and the base ceiling. Section 2.1.
  5. Decree No. 161/2026/ND-CP, 15 May 2026 — the VND 2,530,000 reference level from 1 July 2026. Sections 2.1–2.3.
  6. Decree No. 293/2025/ND-CP, effective 1 January 2026 — regional minimum wages, including Region I. Sections 2.1, 2.3.
  7. Decree No. 219/2025/ND-CP, 7 August 2025 — work permit procedure, exemption categories, and the 90-day cumulative rule. Section 4.4.
  8. Decree No. 12/2022/ND-CP — work permit penalties and deportation. Section 4.4.
  9. Civil Code, No. 91/2015/QH13, with Precedent No. 69/2023/AL, Supreme People's Court — non-compete agreements as arbitrable civil instruments. Section 4.5.
  10. Law on Value-Added Tax, No. 48/2024/QH15, with Resolution No. 204/2025/QH15 — the 10% standard and temporary 8% IT-services rate through 31 December 2026. Section 2.2.

Note on citation approach: statutory instruments above are cited by official title, promulgating authority, and effective date rather than by URL, since government portal links are frequently restructured; readers should retrieve current consolidated texts from the National Assembly, the Government of Vietnam legal database, or the relevant ministry's official publication channels, or through qualified Vietnamese legal counsel. Contribution ceilings, regional minimum wages, and the reference level are revised periodically and should be verified against the schedule in force at the time of modelling.

Share:

Ready to take action?

Turn these insights into a roadmap for your business.

Book a 15-minute no-obligation consultation with our APAC IT experts. We'll review your current setup and provide a tailored IT roadmap within 24 hours.

📋

Free Checklist

10 Critical Checks Before Expanding IT to Greater China

PIPL compliance, network segmentation, bilingual helpdesk setup, and more — everything your IT team needs before Day 1 in China.

Request the checklist →